Will the U.S. and China co-operate on North Korea?

If the U.S. or China, were to exercise military options in North Korea, it would affect all Koreans on the peninsula. The only real difference is the options available to a North or South Korean. The North Koreans have fewer options and already live in dire circumstances. Their options include staying put (hiding, fighting) or flooding into China and South Korea (running). The prosperous South, however, has nowhere to run. Their only real option is to strengthen the DMZ and keep their forces on high alert. China is currently bracing for a possible human tsunami, and have recently strengthened capabilities at their border with North Korea. The U.S. and Japan are looking at measures to evacuate their citizens, while military assets are being moved into theater (THAAD, CSGs, strategic bombers) etc. As you can imagine, pieces are currently being moved around in the region.

The real question is, will China and the U.S. work together to find a resolution? If either party ignores the concerns of the other, and takes unilateral action, a chance of an even worse conflict could arise. Therefore, a regional coalition of the willing is paramount in tackling the belligerent regime in Pyongyang.

The problem is, the North Korean problem is metastasizing. A decade of trade sanctions did limit its growth, yet, only up until very recently did China cease importing North Korean coal. China has started to shift away from being the enabling neighbor it has been for decades. China may soon cease oil exports as well. I ask the question. Has North Korea finally run out of friends? It has no future in its current state. Will it give in peacefully, or will it continue to provocatively wave its nuclear wand in the region ? I guess we can not know until we are at the precipice of war.

If North Korea were to play its military hand first, it would suffer an enormous response, which would undoubtedly usher China and America into its borders. Political capital would have been completely spent. The North Korean regime would be ticketed for destruction. Missiles would rain down on military installations, troops would be flooding in from China. The South would battle to maintain its border. Seoul could be on fire, and Japan would find out how credible the nuclear threat really was (hope your AEGIS destroyers work). Or, the North continues to saber rattle, and the stalemate continues until the North waves the white flag or the U.S loses patience and goes in alone or with allies and friends in the region.

If China has actually ceased its tacit support of the regime, and is ready to uninstall Kim Jong-Un, this may be enough for North Korea to fold under pressure.

Either way, stay tuned, as the North Korean problem isn’t going anywhere.

Please feel free to comment.






On January 29th, 2002, then US president, George W. Bush, outlined three nations in his televised State of the Union address to congress. Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. He described them as being an “Axis of Evil”.

On May 6th, 2002, then Undersecretary of State, John R. Bolton, gave a speech to the Heritage Foundation, titled “Beyond the Axis of Evil: Additional Threats from Weapons of Mass Destruction“. This speech outlined three new additions to this supposed “Axis of Evil”. They were of course, Syria, Libya, and Cuba.


It should come as no surprise, that the purported “WMD’s” that were not found in Iraq, have suddenly manifested in Syria. This proxy war in Syria (with elitist controlled CIA asset Al-Qaeda and their ilk playing the part of freedom fighters and rebels), is now turning into a hot war. The Obama regime (with its stacked deck of Council on Foreign Relations members) is presenting the concept of a “limited strike” to the legislative branch of the US government. The first step, is to test the limited strike proposal with the “Senate Foreign Relations Committee”. They approved 10-7. It will now go to the entire Senate for approval. Watch this space. I’m expecting the legislative branch, with its puppet senators and congressmen of the elite, to give their blessing. If not, then will the executive branch do it alone?


The shock and awe false flag operation on September 11th, 2001, generated an enormous quantity of global sympathy. The world was in shock, the American people were scared and angry. Then as if my magic, the mainstream media quickly painted an enemy, and off the poor and stupid go once again, to fight and die for the elitists. Who benefited, who suffered I ask? Where do I start. With billions of dollars spent on munitions, billions garnered in no-bid contracts to corporations such as Halliburton. Billions spent in the form of higher oil prices, billions in the form of Iraq and US national debt. Billions that could of been spent on healthcare, education, infrastructure, etc. A financially unquantifiable amount in the form of human misery and suffering. The opportunity costs of these taxpayer funded disasters is enormous.  Now, as I am not part of the inner circle, I am not fully aware of the Geo-political implications, but to hazard a guess; destabilization of region, installation of military bases, oil and their respective pipelines. Basically command and control of strategic resources, whether financial (the creation of central banks and debt based currency), human (installing a puppet foreign government), or physical (water, oil, etc).


This never ending neo-conservative “jihad” against terror, is a fraud. What is certain, is that it will create unparalleled debt, destruction, suffering, and will ultimately fail to achieve the impossible task it was supposedly created to do. How do you win a war on terror? Obviously not by spreading, creating, funding, and aiding terrorists. But hay, if you have no enemy, if you have no terror, then there’s no point having a war or terror. There lies the problem. These perpetual wars are doing just what they were designed to do.


Do your own research. Follow alternative media. The mainstream corporate media will provide you with disinformation, bias reporting, omission of important news, distraction and entertainment. It is used as a counter-intelligence tool for the elite. They own it. 5 to 6 media companies in the US control nearly all the media. Lucky for us people are starting to turn off, and follow alternative news. The race is on for an awakening. False flags will  likely continue. Do your research…